Arts and Culture
Authorities
Business and Commerce
Education
Entertainment
Environment
Friends and Family
Health
Love and Relationships
News and Politics
Pets and Animals
Science and Technology
Social and Workplace
Sport
[ LOGIN ]
[ SIGN UP ]
Quick Links
My Cases
My Arguments
My Votes
My Profile
My Account
SEARCH
High Profile Cases
Recent Cases
Closing Soon
Closed Cases
HIGH PROFILE
CASES
Lindsay Lohan
VS.
E-trade
Charge:
E-Trade's "milkaholic" ad is using my name as a parody and for profit
Many celebrities are known by one name only, and E-Trade is using that knowledge to profit. They used the name Lindsay as a parody of my life. E-Trade didn’t get my approval nor offer me compensation for being referred to in the ad.
5D 12H 59M
For Court Rulling
Guilty:
7
Not Guilty:
73
The People
VS.
Goldman Sachs
Charge:
Overpaying your Executive
Goldman has been at the center of a public debate over how much banks should pay out in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, after taking billions of dollars of federal bailout money.We seek to stop Goldman from allocating roughly 47 percent of 2009 net revenue as compensation, saying such allocations "vastly overcompensate management and constitute corporate waste."
5D 3H 8M
For Court Rulling
Guilty:
4
Not Guilty:
1
Categories
All
Arts and Culture
Authorities
Business and Commerce
Education
Entertainment
Environment
Friends and Family
Health
Love and Relationships
News and Politics
Pets and Animals
Science and Technology
Social and Workplace
Sport
Clear Cut Cases
The People VS. Hapoel Beer-sheva
+5
+1
[
CLOSED
]
The People VS. משה קצב
+11
+2
[
CLOSED
]
Adi Nachum VS. Albert Einstein
+4
+1
[
CLOSED
]
more
Close Call cases
Nolan Kurtz VS. Roommate Jordan Roommate
+19
+20
[
CLOSED
]
Lifehacker VS. Digsby
+93
+97
[
CLOSED
]
Roy Jones Jr. VS. Ustream
+14
+15
[
CLOSED
]
more
About
|
Contact Us
|
Terms of Use
|
Advertise Here
All Rights Reserved to "AllRise" © 2008