Arts and Culture
Authorities
Business and Commerce
Education
Entertainment
Environment
Friends and Family
Health
Love and Relationships
News and Politics
Pets and Animals
Science and Technology
Social and Workplace
Sport
[ LOGIN ]
[ SIGN UP ]
Quick Links
My Cases
My Arguments
My Votes
My Profile
My Account
SEARCH
[ Report ]
Bing! Information Design
VS.
Microsoft
Charge:
Trademark infringement, unfair competition, and tortuous interference
Sorry, in order the report this case
you need to
Login
or
Sign Up
.
[ Close ]
Thank you, your report has been submited successfully.
[ Close ]
According to The Wall Street Journal, the computer graphics and multimedia design company founded by John Telford and Brian Williamson says Microsoft’s use of “Bing” confuses the public and incorrectly infers the companies as Bing! Information Design uses the Internet, search engines, and its web page as main sources of advertising and promotion for its services. They also further disclosed that they’ve been using the name since year 2000.
Enter Defense Argument:
500
characters left
Case Status:
CLOSED
Case Opened By:
Dan Rimon
on
February 04, 2010
Tags:
Bing
Microsoft
Search Engine
Category:
Business and Commerce
Ruled on
February 15 2010
Guilty:
1
Not Guilty:
0
Microsoft was found
Guilty
Small Widget
Large Widget
Embed this case widget in your website or blog
[
Close Widget Panel
]
Display Case Debate
Embed Code
Copy and paste the following script code into the HTML source of the site, where you want the case widjet to be displayed
<iframe src='http://widget.allrise.com/SmallWidget.aspx?id=281&showargs=true' frameborder='0' width='315' height='520' scrolling='no'></iframe>
Embed this case widget in your website or blog
[
Close Widget Panel
]
Display Case Description
Enable Voting
Enable Debating
Widget Width:
480
pixels
Embed Code
Copy and paste the following script code into the HTML source of the site, where you want the case widjet to be displayed
<iframe src='http://widget.allrise.com//LargeWidget.aspx?id=281&showdesc=true&showvoting=true&showdebate=true&width=480' frameborder='0' width='495' height='750' scrolling='no'></iframe>
CASE
SUMMARY
Votings:
Guilty:
1
Not Guilty:
0
Arguments:
Prosecution Arguments:
0
Defense Arguments:
1
Total Arguments Strength:
Prosecution:
0
Defense:
0
CASE
HIGHLIGHTS
PROSECUTION
DEFENSE
Most Active Member of the Defense:
Attackgypsy
1
Arguments
CASE
ARGUMENTS
PROSECUTION
There were no prosecution arguments on regards this case
Add a
Prosecution
Argument
Text
Video
1000
characters left
DEFENSE
Sorry, in order the report this argument
you need to
Login
or
Sign Up
.
[ Close ]
Thank you, your report has been submited successfully.
[ Close ]
[ Report ]
Sounds like another nonsense name lawsuit, ala Monster Cable vs Anyone using Monster in their name for any reason.
Posted by
Attackgypsy
30 Days ago.
This Argument is:
Strength:
0
Opposing Arguments:
(
0
)
Add a
Defense
Argument
Text
Video
1000
characters left
About
|
Contact Us
|
Terms of Use
|
Advertise Here
All Rights Reserved to "AllRise" © 2008
