Main Hall
High Profile Cases Recent Cases Closing Soon Closed Cases
CLOSED CASES 
The People VS. Evony Llc
Charge: Inaccurate or Misleading advertising
Nearly all advertisement for Evony Online depict one or more sexually attractive women in seductive positions encouraging players to play with them.That, or they show a game where the player can actively battle with an army of his creationThe game does not depict humans of any kind nor does it allow direct control of armies, as the player does nothing but click options and wait for the actions to complete themselves.The company should produce advertisments which do not mislead its players.
Current Judging  Guilty: 20  Not Guilty: 2
 
Joe Satrtiani VS. Coldplay
Charge: Copyright Infringment
The song "Viva La Vida" by Coldplay, released in 2008, contains elements which mimic the song "If I Could Fly" by Joe Satriani, which was released 4 years earlier in 2004.
Current Judging  Guilty: 3  Not Guilty: 1
 
Judge Goldstone VS. United Nations
Charge: The UN Commits Crimes Against Humanity
The UN forces of NATO confirmed that they killed 12 civilians few days ago in Afghanistan war. and recently a few more civilians.The UN and NATO should be charged with crimes against Humanity after killing so many civilians in the war in Afghanistan http://new...515141.stm
Current Judging  Guilty: 4  Not Guilty: 5
 
Shields VS. Arrington
Charge: Talking on your cellphone while driving
TechCrunch's Michael Arrington was stopped at a red light, talking on his cellphone to get directions to his meeting. Citizen on patrol, Michael Shields lept to the safety of all of Mountain View and stood in front of Arrington's vehicle refusing to move. According to Arrington, Sheilds finally left after he got out of his vehicle.
Current Judging  Guilty: 7  Not Guilty: 2
 
Bing! Information Design VS. Microsoft
Charge: Trademark infringement, unfair competition, and tortuous interference
According to The Wall Street Journal, the computer graphics and multimedia design company founded by John Telford and Brian Williamson says Microsoft’s use of “Bing” confuses the public and incorrectly infers the companies as Bing! Information Design uses the Internet, search engines, and its web page as main sources of advertising and promotion for its services. They also further disclosed that they’ve been using the name since year 2000.
Current Judging  Guilty: 1  Not Guilty: 0
 
The People VS. Barack Hussein Obama
Charge: Not noble Nobel winning
As far as I know this prize is generally granted after performing some actual practice. Unfortunately having some good thoughts isn't really enough. If I want very much to find a cure for cancer or to decipher the equations that describes our universe it wouldn't really do the job unless I really perform something real to gain this aims. If Nobel prize would have been given to those who have good intends and efforts then I guess most of us deserve the very same reward.
Current Judging  Guilty: 2  Not Guilty: 3
 
Evony Llc VS. Bruce Everiss
Charge: DOUBLE POSTED, PLEASE IGNORE
please ignore this case, it got double posted, please go to the case here instead: http://www...veriss/279
Current Judging  Guilty: 2  Not Guilty: 1
 
Evony Llc VS. Bruce Everiss
Charge: posting defamatory and false statements online about Evony LLC and the game Evony: Age I
Bruce Everiss has posted on his blog (http://br...games.com) what Evony LLC claims to be defamatory and false statements.
Current Judging  Guilty: 12  Not Guilty: 19
 
Techcrunch VS. Fusion Garage
Charge: Theft of the CrunchPad intellectual property
The CEO of our partner on the project, Chandra Rathakrishnan, notified us we were no longer involved with the CrunchPad project. Chandra said that based on pressure from his shareholders he had decided to move forward and sell the device directly through Fusion Garage, without TC involvement. We jointly own the product intellectual property, and we solely own the CrunchPad trademark. It’s legally impossible for Fusion Garage to build and sell the CrunchPad device without our agreement.
Current Judging  Guilty: 326  Not Guilty: 43
 
Ki VS. Luigi
Charge: calling me on my lunch break
i just have 15' for breakfast and he knows it but he insists in calling me during it
Current Judging  Guilty: 6  Not Guilty: 7
Back  |   1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |   Next
   
About  |   Contact Us  |   Terms of Use  |   Advertise Here All Rights Reserved to "AllRise" © 2008